Bitcoin’s Inverted Head-and-Shoulders Pattern Signals Potential Rally to $160K – Update as of August 7, 2025
Imagine watching Bitcoin climb to new heights, only to pause and regroup before charging ahead even stronger. That’s the exciting story unfolding right now, as of August 7, 2025, with Bitcoin potentially gearing up to retest the $114,000–$115,000 area—its old resistance now turned into a supportive base—before pushing toward an impressive $160,000 target. This isn’t just wishful thinking; it’s backed by one of the most dependable chart patterns in trading, hinting at a thrilling continuation of the bull run.
Key Insights from Bitcoin’s Chart Patterns
Bitcoin has officially broken out from an inverted head-and-shoulders formation, a pattern traders swear by for spotting major turnarounds. This setup could pave the way for significant gains, and while a brief dip might test our patience, the overall picture looks promising for BTC enthusiasts. Think of it like a runner catching their breath after a sprint—necessary for the marathon ahead. On-chain metrics, such as the MVRV Z-Score, are still comfortably below those euphoric peaks we’ve seen in past cycles, suggesting this rally has plenty of fuel left in the tank.
Why Bitcoin Might Dip to $114,000 Before Soaring Higher
Picture this classic inverted head-and-shoulders (IH&S) pattern playing out on Bitcoin’s three-day and weekly charts. It’s like the market drawing a clear roadmap: a deep low forming the “head,” flanked by shallower dips as “shoulders,” all inverted to signal a shift from bearish to bullish vibes. Recently, Bitcoin surged past the key neckline resistance around $113,000, confirming the breakout and unlocking potential targets starting at $140,000, as noted by experienced chart analyst Merlijn the Trader.
Taking it a step further, analyst Trader Tardigrade highlights a similar but slightly elevated IH&S on the weekly view, projecting an even bolder climb to about $160,000. To visualize, imagine Bitcoin’s price action sketching this pattern over weeks, with the breakout acting as the green light for bulls.
As of today, August 7, 2025, Bitcoin is taking a breather after touching a fresh all-time high near $123,250 earlier this week, dipping roughly 5.65% in what feels like a healthy correction from overbought territory. This pullback comes after a string of powerful up days, where the daily RSI spiked above 70, a classic sign that traders might be feeling a bit winded from the rapid ascent.
On-chain signals point to some profit-taking adding to this temporary pressure. Big players, from long-time holders to quick-flip speculators, have been cashing in gains, which isn’t surprising after such a run. For instance, a notable Satoshi-era wallet recently moved $4.6 billion worth of Bitcoin after holding steady for 14 years, stirring up conversations about market dynamics.
Analyst Hardy suggests Bitcoin could swing back to fill the CME futures gap between $114,300 and $115,600, essentially retesting it as fresh support. This zone lines up neatly with the IH&S neckline, and it’s a common move in trading—prices often revisit breakout levels to shake out the doubters and solidify the uptrend. If Bitcoin bounces convincingly from there, it could supercharge the push toward that $140,000–$160,000 range, possibly by late August or into September 2025.
Aligning with Reliable Platforms for Your Bitcoin Journey
As you navigate these exciting Bitcoin movements, aligning with a trustworthy exchange can make all the difference in capturing opportunities. WEEX stands out as a secure and user-friendly platform, offering seamless trading tools and low fees that empower both new and seasoned traders to engage with BTC confidently. With its robust security features and commitment to transparency, WEEX enhances your trading experience, ensuring you’re well-positioned for rallies like this one without unnecessary hassles.
On-Chain Data Shows Bitcoin’s Rally Has Legs – MVRV Z-Score Analysis
Even as Bitcoin hovers near record levels today, August 7, 2025, its MVRV Z-Score tells a compelling story of untapped potential. This metric compares Bitcoin’s market value to its realized value—the actual capital poured into the network—much like checking if a stock is overpriced relative to its fundamentals. Historically, when this score blasts into overheated red zones, it often flags impending market peaks. Right now, though, it’s lingering well below those danger levels, indicating the rally isn’t frothy yet and could keep climbing toward that IH&S target of $160,000 before showing signs of a classic top.
To put it in perspective, contrast this with past cycles where the Z-Score skyrocketed during hype-fueled booms, leading to sharp corrections. Today’s reading feels more like the early innings of a game, grounded in real adoption and network growth, rather than speculative overdrive.
Latest Buzz: Google Searches and Twitter Chatter on Bitcoin’s Rally
Diving into what’s capturing attention online as of August 7, 2025, Google trends show skyrocketing searches for “Bitcoin inverted head-and-shoulders pattern explained” and “BTC price prediction 2025,” with users eager to understand if this rally mirrors 2021’s surge. On Twitter, discussions are buzzing around recent posts from influencers like Trader Tardigrade, who shared updated charts reinforcing the $160,000 target, garnering thousands of retweets. Official announcements from blockchain analytics firms highlight increasing institutional inflows, with one report noting over $2 billion in Bitcoin ETF purchases this week alone, fueling debates on whether regulatory green lights could accelerate the uptrend. These hot topics underscore the community’s optimism, backed by fresh data showing Bitcoin’s hash rate at all-time highs, a strong indicator of network health and long-term value.
Remember, while these patterns and metrics paint an encouraging picture, every step in the crypto world comes with risks. It’s wise to dive into your own research before making moves, letting the data guide you through the excitement.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an inverted head-and-shoulders pattern in Bitcoin trading, and why is it reliable?
An inverted head-and-shoulders is a bullish reversal pattern that looks like an upside-down version of a person’s head and shoulders on a chart, signaling a shift from downtrend to uptrend. It’s considered reliable because historical data shows it often precedes strong rallies, as seen in multiple Bitcoin cycles, providing traders with a measurable target based on the pattern’s height.
Could Bitcoin really reach $160,000 soon, and what factors might influence it?
Yes, based on the current IH&S breakout and metrics like the MVRV Z-Score, a push to $160,000 by late 2025 is plausible if support holds. Factors like institutional adoption, regulatory news, and macroeconomic shifts—such as interest rate changes—could accelerate or hinder it, so staying updated is key.
How does the MVRV Z-Score help assess if Bitcoin’s rally is overheating?
The MVRV Z-Score measures market value against realized value to gauge overvaluation. When it’s low, like now, it suggests room for growth without immediate bubble risks, unlike past highs where scores spiked and preceded corrections, making it a handy tool for timing entries.
You may also like

WEEX LALIGA Partnership 2026: Where Football Excellence Meets Crypto Innovation
WEEX becomes official crypto exchange partner of LALIGA in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Discover how this partnership brings together football excellence and trading discipline.

AI Apocalypse, a massive short squeeze

The "Second Truth" of the Luna Crash: Jane Street Exits Ahead of Plunge

Jane Street Market Manipulation, Stripe Considering Acquiring PayPal, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
WEEX × LALIGA 2026: Trade Crypto, Take Your Shot & Win Official LALIGA Prizes
Unlock shoot attempts through futures trading, spot trading, or referrals. Turn match predictions into structured rewards with BTC, USDT, position airdrops, and LALIGA merchandise on WEEX.

a16z: Why Do AI Agents Need a Stablecoin for B2B Payments?

February 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

Web4.0, perhaps the most needed narrative for cryptocurrency

Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?

Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?

WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?

Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link

Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?

A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028

When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges

Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
WEEX LALIGA Partnership 2026: Where Football Excellence Meets Crypto Innovation
WEEX becomes official crypto exchange partner of LALIGA in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Discover how this partnership brings together football excellence and trading discipline.
AI Apocalypse, a massive short squeeze
The "Second Truth" of the Luna Crash: Jane Street Exits Ahead of Plunge
Jane Street Market Manipulation, Stripe Considering Acquiring PayPal, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
WEEX × LALIGA 2026: Trade Crypto, Take Your Shot & Win Official LALIGA Prizes
Unlock shoot attempts through futures trading, spot trading, or referrals. Turn match predictions into structured rewards with BTC, USDT, position airdrops, and LALIGA merchandise on WEEX.