From x402 to MPP: Cloudflare's crucial vote, will it go to Coinbase or Stripe?
Author: David Christopher
Compiled by: Jiahua, ChainCatcher
This week, as Stripe launched its flagship product MPP (Machine Payment Protocol) on the Tempo mainnet.
In case you didn't know, Tempo is an L1 EVM chain built by former Paradigm employees and former Ethereum core developers, optimized specifically for payments. MPP is an open agent-to-machine payment protocol based on HTTP that revives the long-dormant HTTP 402 status code, similar to x402, although the architectural concepts of the two are different.
Tempo Mainnet: The Battle for Agentic Commerce on Bankless
The core trade-off between these two protocols is straightforward: x402 prioritizes openness, while MPP offers superior integration with existing payment rails, at the cost of being integrated into the Stripe ecosystem.
Rather than further debate these nuances, let's shift our focus to another dimension. I believe that arguing about the technical merits of MPP versus x402 at this stage is of little value. Beneath the surface, a more interesting and impactful dynamic is at play: Coinbase and Stripe may be vying to establish partnerships with a third powerful and well-established participant, whose support could significantly influence which standard becomes mainstream.
AI Crawlers Overwhelm the Web
But first, before diving deeper, let's reiterate one of the core issues that agent payments aim to solve: agents have made data scraping (the process of extracting data from websites) too easy.
From 2024 to 2025, Wikipedia's traffic surged by 50% as a result, overwhelming servers and causing operational costs to skyrocket. At least 65% of their most resource-intensive requests came from bots. In February 2025, bots bombarded the image library DiscoverLife with millions of requests daily, slowing the site to a near standstill. In August, cloud service provider Fastly reported a case where a bot aggressively attacked a website at a rate of 39,000 requests per minute. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) also reported similar impacts, stating that this wave of scraping "is functionally equivalent to a denial-of-service attack." On one day in November 2025, their traffic soared by 968% compared to the previous year.
Despite measures like implementing robots.txt files (which essentially set rules for where bots can and cannot access on a website), over 13% of scraping tools ignored these rules. They overloaded servers and stressed websites, many of which rely on donations. But commercial websites were not spared either. Reddit tightened its rate limits. Currently, 8 out of the 10 largest news websites block training bots. Across the broader web, 71% of top publishers completely block retrieval bots.
However, the web has not been uniformly blocked. Websites that provide expensive or time-sensitive data (such as prices, hotel bookings, professional datasets) have begun charging for access. Everyday or low-value content can still be scraped for free through caching or proxies. Data scraping has not disappeared; it has instead bifurcated into free and paid categories. This is precisely why x402 and MPP have become necessary.
As Serpin, founder of Ethos Network, pointed out this week: "This scraping dynamic means the internet will change... more closed websites, more human verification, and more isolation of traffic between humans and agents."
Cloudflare: Building Walls and Opening Windows
Enter Cloudflare.
Cloudflare acts as a layer between websites and visitors. It protects websites from attacks, speeds up loading times, and handles traffic at scale. About 20% of websites use it, making it one of the most critical chokepoints on the internet. When Cloudflare makes decisions about how to handle traffic, one-fifth of the internet is affected.
This also means that Cloudflare directly observes the surge in bot traffic and the data scraping pressure on the public (and private) internet—they are working to address this pressure.
Initially, this manifested as a feature allowing websites to block all bots. Then, last year, they launched "pay-per-crawl," allowing websites to charge AI bots micro-payment fees for scraping data instead of completely blocking them. When a bot accesses a page, it either pays and gains access or receives a 402 "Payment Required" response with pricing (sounds familiar?). Cloudflare handles the billing. This is a compromise between "block everything" and "give it away for free."
"Pay-per-crawl" launched in July. In September, Cloudflare and Coinbase jointly established the x402 Foundation. Days later, they announced NET Dollar, a stablecoin for agent payments.
In other words, Cloudflare is both building walls and opening windows. It provides blocking tools as well as paid access tools. They decide what is kept out, what is allowed in, and under what conditions. This position makes their next decision crucial.
NET Dollar is the Real Signal
When Cloudflare announced NET Dollar, they did not specify the issuer.
Although its x402 Foundation partner Coinbase publicly launched a service in December for businesses to issue branded stablecoins, they have yet to disclose it.
Then this week, a report from The Information further confirmed the dynamic we have been discussing, leading to a surge in Cloudflare's stock price. The report specifically mentioned that who will help Cloudflare launch NET Dollar remains an open question, with "companies like Coinbase and ZeroHash" competing for the deal. This wording leaves room for other companies—like Stripe.
Moreover, shortly after the release of MPP on Wednesday, Cloudflare quickly released an MPP proxy to be compatible with the standard. This is not as strange as it seems—MPP also supports x402 payments, so it is not a completely independent standard. However, they have not formally identified the stablecoin issuer, and the company that co-founded the x402 Foundation with them is just one of many vying for this deal, which undoubtedly raises questions.
This is important for the following reason: NET Dollar is built as the default currency for "pay-per-crawl" and other paid access services from Cloudflare. Whoever issues it will have their standard prioritized in Cloudflare's tech stack. If Coinbase issues NET Dollar, Cloudflare will have reason to continue building around x402. If Stripe issues it, MPP will gain the tailwind. Given that Cloudflare handles one-fifth of the internet's traffic and is building infrastructure to intercept bot traffic and monetize it, this prioritization will determine what becomes the default standard across a significant portion of the internet.
The battle between x402 and MPP is not what matters; what matters is Cloudflare's decision on whom to partner with. That is the real issue at hand.
You may also like

BlackRock CEO issues annual open letter: The wave of tokenization has arrived, and we will lead this trend

When Backpack backstabs the community

When gold is no longer a safe haven, and Bitcoin continues to panic

Trump, the World's Largest Oil Trader

If the US and Iran have not reached an agreement in 5 days, what other cards does Trump have?

Tether Whale Dumps £12 Million, Backing Crypto’s ‘British Trump’

Ethereum Foundation Post: Rethinking the Division of Work Between L1 and L2 to Build the Ultimate Ethereum Ecosystem

Two Major Prediction Market Platforms Unite Rarely, What Is the Story Behind This New Fund?

Dragonfly Partners: Most agents will not engage in autonomous trading, how can crypto payments prevail?

US AI Startup Goes All In on Chinese Mega-Model | Rewire News Morning Brief

Trump Lies Again: A "Five-Day Pause" Psyop, How Wall Street, Bitcoin, and Polymarket Insiders Synced Uposciogen

When a Token Becomes Labor, People Become the Interface

Ceasefire News Leaked Ahead of Time? Large Polymarket Bets on Outcome Before Trump's Tweet

BlackRock CEO's Annual Shareholder Letter: How is Wall Street Using AI to Keep Profiting from National Pension Funds?

Sun Valley Releases 2025 Financial Report: Bitcoin Mining Revenue Reaches $670 Million, Accelerating Transformation to AI Infrastructure Platform
On March 16, 2026, in Dallas, Texas, USA, CanGu Company (New York Stock Exchange code: CANG, hereinafter referred to as "CanGu" or the "Company") today announced its unaudited financial performance for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025. As a btc-42">bitcoin mining enterprise relying on a globally operated layout and dedicated to building an integrated energy and AI computing power platform, CanGu is actively advancing its business transformation and infrastructure development.
• Financial Performance:
Total revenue for the full year 2025 was $688.1 million, with $179.5 million in the fourth quarter.
Bitcoin mining business revenue for the full year was $675.5 million, with $172.4 million in the fourth quarter.
Full-year adjusted EBITDA was $24.5 million, while the fourth quarter was -$156.3 million.
• Mining Operations and Costs:
A total of 6,594.6 bitcoins were mined throughout the year, averaging 18.07 bitcoins per day; of which 1,718.3 bitcoins were mined in the fourth quarter, averaging 18.68 bitcoins per day.
The average mining cost for the full year (excluding miner depreciation) was $79,707 per bitcoin, and for the fourth quarter, it was $84,552;
The all-in sustaining costs were $97,272 and $106,251 per bitcoin, respectively.
As of the end of December 2025, the company has cumulatively produced 7,528.4 bitcoins since entering the bitcoin mining business.
• Strategic Progress:
The company has completed the termination of the American Depositary Receipt (ADR) program and transitioned to a direct listing on the NYSE to enhance information transparency and align with its strategic direction, with a long-term goal of expanding its investor base.
CEO Paul Yu stated: "2025 marked the company's first full year as a bitcoin mining enterprise, characterized by rapid execution and structural reshaping. We completed a comprehensive adjustment of our asset system and established a globally distributed mining network. Additionally, the company introduced a new management team, further strengthening our capabilities and competitive advantage in the digital asset and energy infrastructure space. The completion of the NYSE direct listing and USD pricing also signifies our transformation into a global AI infrastructure company."
"As we enter 2026, the company will continue to optimize its balance sheet structure and enhance operational efficiency and cost resilience through adjustments to the miner portfolio. At the same time, we are advancing our strategic transformation into an AI infrastructure provider. Leveraging EcoHash, we will utilize our capabilities in scalable computing power and energy networks to provide cost-effective AI inference solutions. The relevant site transformations and product development are progressing simultaneously, and the company is well-positioned to sustain its execution in the new phase."
The company's Chief Financial Officer, Michael Zhang, stated: "By 2025, the company is expected to achieve significant revenue growth through its scaled mining operations. Despite recording a net loss of $452.8 million from ongoing operations, mainly due to one-time transformation costs and market-driven fair value adjustments, the company, from a financial perspective, will reduce its leverage, optimize its Bitcoin reserve strategy and liquidity management, introduce new capital to strengthen its financial position, and seize investment opportunities in high-potential areas such as AI infrastructure while navigating market volatility."
The total revenue for the fourth quarter was $1.795 billion. Of this, the Bitcoin mining business contributed $1.724 billion in revenue, generating 1,718.3 Bitcoins during the quarter. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $4.8 million.
The total operating costs and expenses for the fourth quarter amounted to $4.56 billion, primarily attributed to expenses related to the Bitcoin mining business, as well as impairment of mining machines and fair value losses on Bitcoin collateral receivables.
This includes:
· Cost of Revenue (excluding depreciation): $1.553 billion
· Cost of Revenue (depreciation): $38.1 million
· Operating Expenses: $9.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Mining Machine Impairment Loss: $81.4 million
· Fair Value Loss on Bitcoin Collateral Receivables: $171.4 million
The operating loss for the fourth quarter was $276.6 million, a significant increase from a loss of $0.7 million in the same period of 2024, primarily due to the downward trend in Bitcoin prices.
The net loss from ongoing operations was $285 million, compared to a net profit of $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The adjusted EBITDA was -$156.3 million, compared to $2.4 million in the same period last year.
The total revenue for the full year was $6.881 billion. Of this, the revenue from the Bitcoin mining business was $6.755 billion, with a total output of 6,594.6 Bitcoins for the year. Revenue from the international automobile trading business was $9.8 million.
The total annual operating costs and expenses amount to $1.1 billion.
Specifically, they include:
· Revenue Cost (excluding depreciation): $543.3 million
· Revenue Cost (depreciation): $116.6 million
· Operating Expenses: $28.9 million (including related-party expenses of $1.1 million)
· Miner Impairment Loss: $338.3 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable Fair Value Change Loss: $96.5 million
The full-year operating loss is $437.1 million. The continuing operations net loss is $452.8 million, while in 2024, there was a net profit of $4.8 million.
The 2025 non-GAAP adjusted net profit is $24.5 million (compared to $5.7 million in 2024). This measure does not include share-based compensation expenses; refer to "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for details.
As of December 31, 2025, the company's key assets and liabilities are as follows:
· Cash and Cash Equivalents: $41.2 million
· Bitcoin Collateral Receivable (Non-current, related party): $663.0 million
· Miner Net Value: $248.7 million
· Long-Term Debt (related party): $557.6 million
In February 2026, the company sold 4,451 bitcoins and repaid a portion of related-party long-term debt to reduce financial leverage and optimize the asset-liability structure.
As per the stock repurchase plan disclosed on March 13, 2025, as of December 31, 2025, the company had repurchased a total of 890,155 shares of Class A common stock for approximately $1.2 million.

The US AI Startup Is Loving China's Open Source Model

Three Weeks of the US-Iran War: Who's Making Money, Who's Paying the Bill?

