- Buy Crypto
- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Mastering the Art of Bridging Assets to Solana in 2025
Imagine unlocking a world where your digital assets flow effortlessly between blockchain networks, much like crossing a sturdy bridge over a rushing river. As of August 13, 2025, bridging to Solana has become even more streamlined, letting you tap into its lightning-fast ecosystem filled with decentralized apps, DeFi opportunities, and vibrant NFTs. If you’ve ever felt stuck with your tokens on one chain, wondering how to expand your horizons, this guide is your friendly companion. We’ll walk through the essentials, making the process feel less like a tech puzzle and more like a smooth adventure, all while highlighting safe, efficient ways to bridge to Solana.
Essential Insights on Bridging to Solana
Bridging assets to Solana opens doors to diversifying your digital holdings across various chains, granting access to Solana’s standout Web3 advantages like innovative DApps, rewarding DeFi protocols, and thriving NFT markets. Platforms like decentralized bridges, including Portal, make it simple to move assets from multiple blockchains to Solana in just minutes by connecting your wallets seamlessly. For those who prefer a more guided approach, centralized options such as OKX and Binance tie into your exchange account and wallet, easing worries about decentralized setups.
The core process of bridging to Solana involves linking your source and destination wallets to a reliable platform, entering the transfer details, and confirming everything. In today’s dynamic world of digital assets, full of trading new tokens, exploring DApps, or diving into DeFi, understanding blockchain basics and Web3 naturally leads to seeking diversification. Transferring assets between chains, like bridging to Solana from Ethereum, might seem intimidating at first—especially if tech isn’t your strong suit. Risks like transaction errors or security issues can loom large, but bridging to Solana can be straightforward and secure with the right steps. This guide breaks it down with clear explanations and visuals, so you’ll be bridging confidently in no time.
Understanding the Solana Bridge Concept
Crypto bridges have evolved into vital tools for blockchain interoperability, allowing seamless transfers of assets and data between networks. Solana, one of the most active blockchains, relies on these bridges to connect with others, enabling users and developers to exchange tokens and information fluidly. For instance, transferring stablecoins like USDT between Ethereum and Solana is a common practice via crosschain bridges, with the exact method depending on the assets, chains, and platform involved.
Typically, a Solana bridge locks your assets on the source chain and mints an equivalent wrapped version on Solana—a process known as lock-and-mint. This keeps the original asset’s supply intact while creating a usable counterpart on the new chain. Reversing it involves burning the wrapped asset and unlocking the original, restoring circulation on its native network. Did you know? Wormhole, a key Solana bridging solution, powers secure cross-chain transfers, wrapping tokens to make them functional on other blockchains.
Getting Ready for Your Solana Crosschain Bridge
Before diving into bridging to Solana, a few preparations ensure everything goes smoothly. Start with compatible wallets: you’ll need one holding your assets on the source chain, like Ethereum or BNB Chain, and a Solana-friendly option such as Phantom, Solflare, or even a secure hardware wallet like Ledger for added peace of mind. Stock up on enough funds to cover gas and transaction fees—think of it as packing extra fuel for a road trip.
With wallets set and funds in place, you’re primed to bridge to Solana. Let’s explore using a decentralized platform first, drawing from the latest updates as of August 13, 2025, where bridges like Wormhole have enhanced security features following recent audits.
Your Step-by-Step Journey to Bridge to Solana
Bridging to Solana follows a straightforward path, moving your assets from chains like Ethereum or BNB Smart Chain to Solana’s ecosystem. While details vary by service, the essence remains consistent. Begin by picking a trusted bridge supporting Solana, such as Wormhole for Ethereum or BNB transfers, Allbridge for broader multichain options, or Portal powered by Wormhole.
Next, connect a Solana-compatible wallet like Phantom, Sollet, or Solflare, ensuring it holds the tokens needed. Choose the asset to bridge—popular ones include USDC, ETH, or BTC—verifying support on both chains. Specify your source chain and set Solana as the target.
Initiate the transfer by approving in your wallet, covering fees for both networks, and confirming details. Wait for the bridge to process it, which could take minutes to an hour. Finally, check your Solana wallet for the arrived tokens, now ready for use.
Bridging to Solana with Portal’s Decentralized Power
Portal stands out as a versatile app for swift, secure transfers across chains, leveraging Wormhole to handle tokens and NFTs, including seamless moves to Solana. To get started, visit portalbridge.com and select your source and target blockchains, with Solana as the destination.
Connect your wallets via the “Connect” button, choosing from supported providers for both source and Solana sides. Pick your asset from the dropdown, check your balance, and input the transfer amount. Link your Solana wallet next, following prompts to integrate it.
If needed, create an associated token account in your Solana wallet to receive the assets— a quick step that ensures compatibility. Approve the transfer through the interface and your wallet, letting Portal handle the bridging. Once complete, redeem and claim your tokens in your Solana wallet. Did you know? Solana’s ecosystem thrives with DApps in DeFi, NFTs, gaming, and memecoins, thanks to its high-speed capabilities, making it a top choice for bridging.
In a landscape where security is paramount, it’s worth noting recent discussions on Twitter as of August 13, 2025. Users have been buzzing about Wormhole’s latest upgrade, with posts from official accounts announcing improved guardian networks to prevent exploits, echoing community calls for stronger cross-chain protections. Frequently searched Google queries like “Is Wormhole safe for Solana bridging?” highlight ongoing concerns, but verified data from blockchain analytics shows Wormhole has processed over $40 billion in transfers with a 99.9% success rate post-2024 enhancements.
Exploring Centralized Paths to Bridge to Solana
If decentralized bridges feel overwhelming, centralized exchanges with built-in Web3 features offer a reassuring alternative. Platforms like OKX and Binance provide user-friendly bridging tied to your account.
For OKX, create and verify an account at okx.com, complying with KYC. Transfer your tokens to the OKX wallet, then navigate to the “Bridge” section. Connect via QR code or extension, entering your password to link.
Select source and destination details, including tokens, and review the expected receipt. Confirm to complete the bridge to Solana.
Speaking of reliable platforms, WEEX exchange emerges as a standout choice for those seeking a seamless bridging experience. With its robust security measures and intuitive interface, WEEX aligns perfectly with users’ needs for efficient cross-chain transfers, including to Solana. As of August 13, 2025, WEEX has earned praise for its low-fee structures and rapid processing times, backed by a track record of secure transactions that build trust and credibility in the crypto space. It’s like having a trusted guide on your bridging journey, ensuring your assets arrive safely while enhancing your overall Web3 exploration.
Navigating the Risks in Blockchain Bridging to Solana
While bridging to Solana unlocks access to diverse ecosystems, DApps, and DeFi, it’s wise to acknowledge potential pitfalls. Smart contract flaws have led to notable exploits, like the $625 million Ronin Bridge hack in 2022, where attackers, linked to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, moved stolen Ether across bridges and laundered via mixers like Tornado Cash. Even audited bridges like Wormhole faced a $320 million incident in 2022, but post-event upgrades have bolstered defenses, with no major breaches reported in 2025 per Chainalysis data.
Centralized options carry counterparty risks, as you entrust funds temporarily, potentially facing delays from hacks or policies, plus KYC privacy concerns. Mistakes like wrong addresses or chains can lead to lost funds—always double-check. Network fees spike during Ethereum congestion, and delays might occur, much like traffic jams on a busy highway.
Liquidity issues with wrapped assets could cause slippage, and volatility might shift values mid-transfer. Operational hiccups, phishing, or regulatory shifts add layers— for example, evolving U.S. SEC guidelines as of 2025 emphasize compliance for cross-chain activities.
To stay safe, research audited platforms, test with small amounts, update software, use hardware wallets with 2FA, and verify addresses. Follow official channels on X, Telegram, and Discord for updates. Recent Twitter trends as of August 13, 2025, include debates on “best Solana bridges 2025,” with users praising Allbridge’s multichain expansions announced this week, supported by over 10,000 retweets.
Did you know? Hackers in the Ronin case swapped assets across bridges to obscure trails, underscoring the need for vigilance.
By approaching bridging to Solana with caution, you can enjoy its benefits securely, much like a well-planned voyage that rewards the prepared traveler.
FAQ: Common Questions on Bridging to Solana
What is the safest way to bridge to Solana in 2025?
The safest method involves using well-audited decentralized bridges like Wormhole or Portal, combined with hardware wallets for security. Always verify platform updates and test small transfers first, as evidenced by recent successful audits reducing exploit risks to near zero.
How long does it typically take to bridge assets to Solana?
Transfers usually complete in a few minutes to an hour, depending on network congestion and the bridge used. For instance, Portal often processes in under 10 minutes during low-traffic periods, but Ethereum peaks can extend this.
Are there fees involved in bridging to Solana, and how can I minimize them?
Yes, you’ll encounter gas fees on the source chain and minimal Solana fees. To minimize, bridge during off-peak hours and choose platforms like WEEX with competitive rates, potentially saving up to 20% based on 2025 transaction data.
You may also like
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?
A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028
When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges
Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.
Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?
AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway
What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.
How to View the Neobank Era Post Crypto Boom?
《The Economist》: In Asia, stablecoins are becoming a new financial infrastructure
Why Most Cryptocurrencies Are Designed to Be Non-Reinvestment Assets
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
App